https://www.dpreview.com/articles/8653213690/test-results-canon-eos-...
Even set to the mode designed to limit pre-recording temperature build-up, the clock is essentially running from the moment you turn the camera on. Video recording is the most processor-intensive (and hence most heat generating) thing you can do, but any use of the camera will start to warm it up, and start chipping away at your recording times. Consequently, any time spent setting up a shot, setting white balance, setting focus or waiting for your talent to get ready (or shooting still images) will all cut into your 에이브이ailable recording time, and you won't reliably get the full amount Canon advises.
You can see that the EOS R5 promises reduced recording capability even after 30 minutes of cooling but actually shoots close to its full capability again. However, the R6 only regains around 1/2 its capability after a 30 minute cool-down period, presumably because it doesn't h에이브이e the R5's metal rear plate to dissipate heat. The batteries died before we were able to complete the third test.
EOS R5 suggestions:
•Expect to shoot line-skipped 30p for the bulk of your footage
•Only use 8K or oversampled HQ 4K for occasional B-Roll
•4K/120 and 8K will cut into your shooting time quickest of all
•Be aware of your setup time and cumulative usage (including stills shooting)
EOS R6 suggestions:
•Don’t expect to be able to shoot for extended periods
•Be aware of the need for extensive cooling periods between bursts of shooting
역시나 r6는 플라스틱 바디라서 열이 잘 식지 않는다고 지적하고 있네요
쿨다운 소요시간이 r5대비 2배 ㄷ ㄷ
카메라를 켜는 것 자체가 내부를 뜨겁게 만들어 사진만 찍으며 쓰더라도
카메라를 기동하는 순간부터 동영상 촬영 가능 시간이 점점 줄어드므로
결과적으로 사용자는 캐논이 제시한 촬영가능시간을 신뢰할 수 없게
될 것이란 이야기군요.